Skip to main content

AGICY VS THE REST · PRICES NEED MATCHED SETTINGS

Compare AI video pricing fairly

First compare the same Wan 3.0 model and 1080p output across usage-based APIs. Then review subscription studios separately. Different models and plans are never presented as equivalent output.

LIKE FOR LIKEWan 3.0 · text-to-video · 1080p · 10s · 16:9·PRICE BASISprovider/API estimate vs AGICY customer checkout

Same model: Wan 3.0, 1080p

Published usage rates are not checkout totals. Competitor prices below are upstream/API amounts before their payment fees or taxes; AGICY shows the live customer price.

AGICY
LIVE CUSTOMER QUOTE

AGICY · Wan 3.0

Text-to-video · 10s · 1080p · 16:9 · no audio

Loading…price to customer for this clip
Refresh shortly for a live quote

Pay per render; no recurring plan required. This quote is from the same live catalogue and price formula used by checkout. Audio or reference inputs can change eligibility and price.

Configure this render →
USAGE-BASED API

fal · Wan 3.0

Text-to-video · 10s · 1080p · 16:9

$2.00published model/API amount
$0.20 / output second before account/payment fees and tax

Published Wan 3.0 rate is $0.20/sec at 1080p. Same named model and resolution, but provider implementation, audio defaults, queue performance and final account charges may differ.

Official model and rate ↗
USAGE-BASED API

Higgsfield API · Wan 3.0

Text-to-video · 10s · 1080p standard list rate

$2.00published standard-rate estimate
$0.20 / output second promotions may change the rate

Higgsfield publishes Wan 3.0 standard rates by resolution; its Wan 3.0 Prime is a separate, higher-priced variant. Confirm the exact selected route and current rate in its API console before treating this as a payable quote.

Official Wan 3.0 rate ↗
USAGE-BASED API

Runway API · Wan 3

Wan 3 · 1080p · 10s · API credits

$2.00published API credit estimate
20 credits/sec × $0.01 before credit purchase/payment fees

Runway documents 20 credits/sec for Wan 3 at 1080p and $0.01 per API credit. This is an API-credit estimate, not a Runway Studio subscription price; credits are separate.

Official API pricing ↗

A LOWER-COST MODEL OPTION · NOT THE SAME MODEL

Could Wan 2.7 cost less?

Together AI lists Wan 2.7 text-to-video with 720p/1080p support. Its official launch article says pricing starts at $0.10 per generated second, but the model listing’s displayed unit is not fully consistent. We should verify the actual API quote and output before advertising a specific 1080p saving or switching production traffic.

Check Together AI Wan 2.7 ↗

Subscription studios: a different buying model

These examples show plan economics, not one-off API quotes. “Per clip” is only an allocated average if the stated credits are fully used on that exact example.

MONTHLY CREDIT PLAN

OpenArt · Wan 3.0 example

5s · 720p · 200 credits — not matched to the 1080p API cards above

$0.65–$0.70allocated per example clip
$13/month annual-billed equivalent or $14 monthly assuming 20 example clips consume all 4,000 credits

Plan includes other features; unused credits, annual prepayment, taxes and other benefits are excluded from this simple allocation. Not a stand-alone generation quote.

Official plans and credit examples ↗
CREATOR SUBSCRIPTION

Higgsfield Studio

Monthly/annual plans and credits; separate from Higgsfield API billing

Plan-dependentnot directly comparable per clip
Limited free use and paid credit plans model access and credit costs vary

The consumer studio and usage-based API are different products. We do not divide a plan price by hypothetical clips and present that as a guaranteed render price.

Official plan explanation ↗
STUDIO SUBSCRIPTION

Runway Studio

Plan credits are distinct from API credits

Plan-dependenteffective use varies by model
Free and paid plan options features/credit allocations differ

Subscription allocation depends on tier, billing period, model and how much of the monthly allotment is used. Runway API credits are purchased separately.

Official studio plans ↗

What this comparison does—and doesn’t—claim

  • Same-model comparison: the first group compares Wan 3.0 at 1080p for the selected duration. It does not promise identical output quality or provider behavior.
  • Different models stay separate: Together Wan 2.7 may offer a lower-cost route, but it is not a Wan 3.0 price substitute. Test quality, audio, latency, dimensions and actual bill first.
  • Customer price vs API cost: competitor API figures exclude their payment funding fees and tax. AGICY is a customer checkout quote and includes its platform pricing and estimated payment processing.
  • No blanket “cheaper” claim: some competitors have pay-as-you-go APIs or free tiers. AGICY’s verifiable distinction is that a user can start a render without buying a recurring subscription, plus an integrated creation workflow.
  • Features: AGICY combines trend/topic inspiration, campaign prompts, hook/camera/sound controls and model selection in its studio. Other platforms also have creative tools; this is a workflow comparison, not a claim that those features are exclusive.
  • E + A: provider rates do not expose independently metered electricity per clip. Energy is embedded in hosted compute; model and asset costs vary by engine and configuration.

Public prices and promotions can change. Sources checked October 6, 2026. AGICY’s quote refreshes from its live catalogue; verify the exact settings and final payable amount at checkout.

AI video pricing comparison FAQ

How do you compare AI video prices fairly?

The main comparison holds model family, output resolution, aspect ratio and clip duration constant where vendors publish comparable rates. API costs and customer checkout totals are labeled separately; subscription-credit examples are in a separate section.

Is AGICY 30–35% cheaper than other AI video services?

We do not make a blanket cheaper claim. Some competitors offer usage-based APIs and free tiers. The page compares specific published rates and live AGICY checkout prices for stated settings; actual value depends on model, usage and payment costs.

Is Together AI Wan 2.7 the same as AGICY's Wan 3.0?

No. Wan 2.7 and Wan 3.0 are different model versions. A lower listed starting rate is not a like-for-like price or quality comparison. Confirm the current API quote, settings and output before choosing a route.

Does AGICY publish a separate energy cost per video?

No. The vendors in this comparison do not publish independently measured electricity consumption per clip in their price lists. Energy is embedded in provider infrastructure and compute costs; AGICY does not invent a kWh figure.

Are the video models equal in quality?

No. Wan 3.0, Wan 3.0 Prime and Seedance 2.0 Pro are different models. The table compares published price and configuration, not equivalent quality or guaranteed output.

Are subscription-credit costs the same as pay-as-you-go prices?

No. An effective subscription cost divides the plan price by the provider-listed credit use for a clip. It assumes credits are used for that model and excludes taxes, unused or expired credits, and the value of other plan features.